Kingdom of the Netherlands, represented, in Case T‑208/11, initially by M. Bulterman, N. Noort and C. Schillemans, and subsequently, as well as in Case T‑508/11, by C. Wissels, M. Bulterman and J. Langer, acting as Agents,
Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), established in Herning (Denmark), represented by V. Koppe, A. M. van Eik and T. Buruma, lawyers,Ĭouncil of the European Union, represented by G. Étienne and E. Finnegan, acting as Agents, ‛Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism - Freezing of funds - Applicability of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 to situations of armed conflict - Possibility for an authority of a third State to be classified as a competent authority within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP - Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds - Reference to terrorist acts - Need for a decision of a competent authority for the purpose of Common Position 2001/931’ JUDGMENT OF THE GENERAL COURT (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition)
Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) v Council of the European Union.Ĭommon foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism - Freezing of funds - Applicability of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 to situations of armed conflict - Possibility for an authority of a non-member State to be classified as a competent authority within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP - Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds - Reference to terrorist acts - Need for a decision of a competent authority within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931.ĭigital reports (Court Reports - general) Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition), 16 October 2014. Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition), 16 October 2014.#Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism - Freezing of funds - Applicability of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 to situations of armed conflict - Possibility for an authority of a non-member State to be classified as a competent authority within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP - Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds - Reference to terrorist acts - Need for a decision of a competent authority within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931.#Joined Cases T‑208/11 and T‑508/11.